EFTA00015303
Comments
File Details
- File Name
- EFTA00015303.pdf
- Data Set
- DS 8
- Type
- Category
- court record
- Size
- 1.2 MB
- Pages
- 22
Document Text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. : 20 Cr. 330 (MN) x MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, MARTINDELL, AND THE FIFTH AMENDMENT TO SUPPRE ALL EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE GOVERNMENT'S SUBPOENA T AND TO DISMISS COUNTS FIVE AND SIX Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Denver, CO 80203 Mark S. Cohen Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP Bobbi C. Sternheim Attorneys for Chislaine Maxwell EFTA00015303 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ii FACTUAL BACKGROUND 1 ARGUMENT 2 I. The government's violation of the Fourth Amendment requires suppression. 2 A. The subpoena violated the Fourth Amendment because it was unconstitutionally overbroad. 4 B. The government's subpoena toa was an unconstitutional warrantless Fourth Amendment search 6 1. The third-party doctrine does not compel a different result. 8 C. The government's subpoena t' - an unconstitutional Fourth Amendment seizure. 11 II. The government's violation of Martindell requires suppression 11 III. The government's violation of the Fifth Amendment requires suppression 15 Conclusion 17 Certificate of Service 18 EFTA00015304 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Boyd v United States, 116 U.S. 616 (1886) 3, 6, 15 Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2206 (2018) 3, 5, 6, 9 Colorado v. Bannister, 449 U