EFTA02639849

Document Text

From: Barry J. Cohen Sent: Saturday, August , : To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: [External] Plane Some trips for Apollo are not 135 compliant due to minor issues of crew res= or otherwise. So occasionally we have to fly Part 91 on Apollo flights. =ard to do without Apollo being operator. Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 18, 2017, at 10:57 PM, Jeffrey Epstein cleevacation@gmailcom> wro=e: > Apollo? » On Aug 18, 2017, at 10:56 PM, Barry J. Cohen » wrote= » We are factoring this into our structure recommendations. Lots of cons=raints. Apollo doesn't want to be an owner or an operator. Makes 91 operat=ons for Apollo tricky. » Sent from my iPhone » On Aug 18, 2017, at 8:23 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]» wrote: » ex Forwarded message » From: Melanie Spinella » Date: Thu, May 21, 2015 at 2:54 PM » Subject: Plane » To: "jeffrey E." » <jeevacation@gmailcom<mailto:[email protected]» >> » Jeffrey — Leon asked me to ask you. Debra is going to Chicago May » 30t= — back and forth the same day. Here is the response from Jet » Hi Melanie, » For May 30th with the 12pm departure out of Teterboro and 11pm departure=out of Chicago the duty day is at 15hrs18min. For 135 trips crew cannot ex=eed 14hr duty day. If you wish to operate this flight as 135 we must do a =rew swap in Chicago. If we were to operate this fight as 91 with a Chief P=lot approval we could extended the duty day to 16hrs. Please let me know h