EFTA02461901

Document Text

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 12:44 PM To: Richard Kahn Subject: Re: 124 Parc Monceau steve can argualble take a bad debt deduction for most of =t.. ? On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Richard Kahn wrote: 0 as Steve believes his estate is in debt St=ve mentioned that Moens put a claim into Paul's sister for 60,000 =s Paul owes Moens money as well <=iv style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:11pt;text-align:left;color:black=BORDER-BOTTOM:medium none;BORDER-LEFT:medium none;PADDING-BOTTOM:0in;PADDI=G-LEFT:0in;PADDING-RIGHT:0in;BORDER-TOP:ifb5c4df ipt solid;BORDER-RIGHT:med=um none;PADDING-TOP:3pt">From: Je=frey Epstein <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: i spoke with S=eve last week and again today about what amount he believes is fair that h= should receive back in this deal. attached schedule shows that stev= invested 408,000 and loaned 40,000 to paul which was used for 124 parc so=his total invested is approximately 448,000 (subject to final thorough rev=ew). steve understands that per agreement he is entitled to SO. Q=A0after some back and forth steve proposed that of the approximately 300,0=0 remaining in this deal after all bills are paid he receive 180,000 and j=e receives 120,000. steve said that he is comfortable with whatever =ecision you make and was a gentleman on the phone. please advise =div>thank you Richa=d Kahn HBRK Associates Inc. Be=in forwarded message: <=>From: Stephen