EFTA02640644

Document Text

From: Barry J. Cohen Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 7:59 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Engine Plans Agree on the back of the line concern. From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 3:53 PM To: Barry J. Cohen Subject: Re: Engine Plans not only cost, but you are at the back of the line. why take a plane that has no program , first second or third On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Barry J. Cohen IlMa > wrote: I would have thought it's just a matter of cost, but if you're saying the discount on Pearlman planes is more than the RR program catch up payment, I guess I'm wrong. From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]> ] Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 3:49 PM To: Barry J. Cohen Subject: Re: Engine Plans nonsense , look at ron perlmans planes. no buyers at realistic prices and the excuse is no program. on his planes , there are always alternative planes so you take one with the program On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Barry J. Cohen < > wrote: Banks don't require it. But they increase the amortization on the loan with no program. Our consultants say they agree with you on the RR program helping to boost the owner to the top of the list when it comes to service and repairs. However, they have not observed that prospective buyers have concerns about planes whose owners don't take the program. They say as long as the owner is US corporate or US very high net worth, they will ask questions