EFTA02582296

Document Text

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 10:16 PM To: soon yi previn "It is our expert opinion that Dylan was not se=ually abused by Mr. Allen," the hospital's report, dated M=r. 17, 1993, said. "Further, we believe that statements on videotape and her statem=nts to us during our evaluation do not refer to actual events that occurred to her on August 4, 1992." According to the hospital, in Sept. 1992, the initial referral was made to it by the Connecticut State police at a meeting involving then-State's Attorney Frank Maco and members of the child sexual ab=se team. "At that meeting, the history that police had at the time was br=efly presented and the videotape (taken by Ms. Farrow) of Dylan telling what had reportedly happened to her was reviewed," the document stated.=/p> PHOTOS: Top Celebrity Sex Scandals</=> The hospital officials said that two major questions that were posed in the referral were: "Is Dylan telling the truth and did we think =hat she was sexually abused?" In 16 interviews stretching from Sept. 8, 1992 to Dec. 4, 1992, investigators spoke with all parties involved (Allen, both of her parents, two babysitters and two psychotherapists, per the report) and "interviewed [Dylan] on nine occasions." According to the report, "Dylan presented as an intelligent, ver=al 7-year-old whose storytelling was quite elaborate and fantasy-like at times and who manifested loose associations in her thinking. "She appear