EFTA02503289

Document Text

From: Peter L. Corsell Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 4:47 PM To: jeffrey E. Cc: Boris Nikolic Subject: Re: Indeed. At least everyone can be=focused on one set of signed documents and the parties can send signed/init=aled red-lines back and forth. I think Boris should make whatever cha=ges he wants to the documents, let's just narrow the areas of disagreement,=so Boris and David can find some acceptable middle ground and be done with i=. So, while Boris' changes may be significant, I think it's better to=limit the number of changes to as few as possible. I am personally in=ifferent on the promissory note concept, but I am obviously not in charge h=re. Talk to you both soon. Peter On M=y 5, 2015, at 12:39 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.=om» wrote: On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Peter L. C=rsell > wrote: Hey, =o, I forwarded your email to David and we discussed. In addition to t=e fact that the proposal was unsigned by Boris (but let's leave tha= aside), David doesn't like the note structure because his attorney= believe he will have more protection as the general partner of a new vehic=e that actually owns the shares. Rather than potentially obtaining a j=dgment and having to collect from Boris personally. </=iv> David would like Boris to choose one of the two offers he submitted=to Gunderson, based on Gunderson's original framework (the one you s=nt to me and then I sent it to David and then his attorneys edited it and