EFTA02559300

Document Text

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2017 5:13 PM To: Richard Kahn Subject: Re: Re: im aware / i thought that if=max continues to be obsitnate , more agressive steps will be t=ken and soon thx no need to indemnify him. .=C2 and highly unusual for a lawyer to request. harry can make thi= all go away, but it apears max is feeding him bad info On Sat, Dec 2,=2017 at 11:51 AM, Richard Kahn wrote: Richard Kahn HBRK Associ=tes Inc. 575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor <https://maps.goo=le.com/?q=575+Lexington+Avenue,+4th+FloorNew+York,+NY+10022&entry==mail&source=g> New=York, NY 10022 <https://maps.google.com/?q=575+Lexingtor+Avenue,+4th+FloorNew+York,+NY+10022&entry=gmail&source=g> Phone 212-971-1306=/a> Fax 646.350.0954 <tel:(646)%20350.0=54> Cel Begin fo=warded message: From: D=borah Pechet Quinan <dq=riw.com <mailto: Date: December 2, 2017 at 11:02:38 AM EST =o: Richard Kahn Subject: Re: Richard, Let's see how my discussion with Harry goes (hopefully on Mond=y) as that is the authorized course of action at this point. I will update=everyone as soon as that has occurred and will keep everyone posted in the=meantime as the telephone conference is being set up. I agree with your characterization of Max's inquiries and stat=ments. However I am not yet convinced that recommending to Noam that=he indemnify Max for Max's past trust administration practices wil= be in Noam's best interests given how much was distributed