EFTA02566615

Document Text

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 1:31 PM To: Steven Sinofsky Subject: Re: agreement send an agreement that you would sign after they negotiate you on some mean=ngless provsions . On Fri, Feb 22= 2013 at 10:41 PM, Steven Sinofsky ok. I agree. Will talk to Jay. rote: if the ag=eement is not petty then we have to think about PR -- there's no money w=rth going through another round of steve's orchestrated stuff. The da=age was real - not just emotional and in my own head. Sent from Windows Mail From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent: Februa=y 22, 2013 7:34 PM To: Steven Sinofsky Subject: Re: agreement cooperation should suggest 18months but give if need be,=A0 i want items left to negotiate. no not petty, but i want to se= the agreemnt with respect to vesting your stock, immediatley, we=will give a lock up for period of time if need be . any other =on money terms are irrelvant. On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Steven Sino=sky wrote: Jay wants to do a blackline of the terms as they promised so as not to=look random or not genuine in terms of the flow of discussions. I think=that is ok and brad does work that way. THey want =o send this and follow up with financials Monday as we talked about. Th=y like the idea but think that they will still focus on $15M. I am tryi=g to get them to see that this is about disclosure and precedence. To me, this agreement reads like Microsoft is petty -- d= you think so? I mean tellin