EFTA02502389

Document Text

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 10:22 PM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: Re: FW: it is in exchange for a relase it is only vali= if the release is signed On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Boris Nikolic OK</=> rote: Just a quick question Q=8040 do I need something like that this promissory notes expires on May 1=th or so. If they do not counter si=n, there is a chance of dispute or default. I would rather have an e=piration on it From: jeffre= E. [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]> ] Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 2:52 PM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: Re: FW: the clawback is not davids problem., it is you=s. gunderson has not moved your closer for 6 months now.=C24, , forget them and get it done wrote: On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Boris Nikolic Please see a comment belo=. What do you think?=u> Gunderson was always very=worry about clawback issue </a EFTA_R1_01630664 EFTA02502389 < = > <1=> From: Steve =. Ram Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, </=> I realize from your persp=ctive that Jeffrey's approach is attractive as you don't h=ve to come out of pocket for the $400k up front. I just want to make sure you under=tand the clawback exposure. David won't sign up for any claw=ack, which effectively leaves you on the hook. Depending on the perf=rmance of Blue Talon and Digisite in relation to the rest of the companies in the Fund, the exposure could b