EFTA02633006

Document Text

From: 1 <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, March 2, 2019 9:59 PM To: Darren Indyke Subject: Re: erika is a no. ken star is a yes. . =AO modify it to deal wwith the articles that have been printed. =br> On Sat= Mar 2, 2019 at 4:48 PM Darren Indyke < wrote: <mailto > > Yes to VI. I spoke =o Marty. He said he is jammed. I have my mothers 80th birthday event this =vening and will be modifying the letter tomorrow. Marty thinks Erika shout= sign the VI letter. Not sure of how Erika is perceived in the VI. B=t on the other hand it is another women speaking on your behalf. Will lose=the we were there so we know what happened first hand flavor if Erika sign=. I think on balance my vote would be the same legal team that signed the =YT letter should sign this one. If we need the local flavor Erika could tr=nsmit it if that could help in any way. I am less=certain about Miami. They have a vested interest in disproving anything we=say, spinning it negatively and then publishing it to your disadvantage.=C2 Kathy emailed me that she will be working on the =asse letter when she gets home tonight. She said she would send to us when=she finishes it. Sent from my iPhone. Please excuse the typos. =A0 On Mar 2, 2019, at 4:30 PM, J <[email protected]&g=; wrote: i think we make a modiciation of todays letter and send to miami ?=C2 another to vi? they have run 3 huge pages a =ay for 5 days. thoughts? please note The=information contained in this communication