ffb29640bb028647
Comments
File Details
- File Name
- 09ad2b0e09692a4d0ab2e2538bf8e5bf.pdf
- Data Set
- DS 2004
- Type
- Category
- web archive
- Size
- 2.1 MB
I. TABLE OF CONTENTS PART FIVE OF SIXTEEN “Cash for Kids” Federal Judge Sweet Dismisses Case Against Ghislaine Maxwell; The Murder of Virginia Giuffre. Page I. TABLE OF CONTENTS II. THE FEDERAL CASH FOR KIDS JUDGES (INTRO.).................................. 2 1. Judge Robert W. Sweet- Giuffre v. Maxwell, S.D.N.Y...................................... 4 The Smoking Gun, Pt. Five of Sixteen, Pg. 1 of 14 II. THE FEDERAL CASH FOR KIDS JUDGES Introduction In the entire history of American law, not a single case against Donald J. Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, or others implicated in elite child trafficking networks have ever been granted a trial. Every attempt has been unlawfully dismissed by the “Cash for Kids” federal judges named herein—judges who exist to gatekeep the federal court system and silence the truth. Their objective is to banish victims from justice and prevent them from setting the record straight. What the government fears most is that the claims of those trafficked by their enterprise, corporate shareholders, and subsidiaries be entered into the public record—permanently preserved in history and beyond their control. Those who have dared to expose corruption at this level—or file claims of this magnitude—have often paid the ultimate price. Whistleblowers and survivors
I. TABLE OF CONTENTS PART FIVE OF SIXTEEN “Cash for Kids” Federal Judge Sweet Dismisses Case Against Ghislaine Maxwell; The Murder of Virginia Giuffre. Page I. TABLE OF CONTENTS II. THE FEDERAL CASH FOR KIDS JUDGES (INTRO.).................................. 2 1. Judge Robert W. Sweet- Giuffre v. Maxwell, S.D.N.Y...................................... 4 The Smoking Gun, Pt. Five of Sixteen, Pg. 1 of 14 II. THE FEDERAL CASH FOR KIDS JUDGES Introduction In the entire history of American law, not a single case against Donald J. Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, or others implicated in elite child trafficking networks have ever been granted a trial. Every attempt has been unlawfully dismissed by the “Cash for Kids” federal judges named herein—judges who exist to gatekeep the federal court system and silence the truth. Their objective is to banish victims from justice and prevent them from setting the record straight. What the government fears most is that the claims of those trafficked by their enterprise, corporate shareholders, and subsidiaries be entered into the public record—permanently preserved in history and beyond their control. Those who have dared to expose corruption at this level—or file claims of this magnitude—have often paid the ultimate price. Whistleblowers and survivors