EFTA00029499

Document Text

From: ' (USANYS)" To: "IIIUSAN ir>, " (USANYS) [Contractor]" Cc: "I (USANYS (USANYS)" Subject: RE: Epstein and SDNY in 2016 Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 21:01:13 +0000 Agreed. To my knowledge, we've never spoken to about or heard about a second meeting or a meeting about a perjury charge, so while I don't know that such a meeting occurred, I'm not sure we're in a position right now to push back. From: (USANYS) Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 4:54 PM To: (USANYS) [Contractor] Cc: (USANYS); (USANYS); (USANYS); (USANYS) Subject: Re: Epstein and SDNY in 2016 Don't think there much we can do here so I'd leave it alone. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 12, 2020, at 4:37 PM, (USANYS) [Contractor] cz:, wrote: Stephen Brown is filing his story shortly on the Epstein investigation (which includes discussion of the apparent decision by the Office in 2016 not to pursue the matter). If there's any guidance you think we can and should provide, please let us know in the next hour. From: (USANYS) [Contractor] Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 11:15 AM To: (USANYS) (USANYS) (USANYS) < >; (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) < Subject: FW: Epstein and SDNY in 2016 Stephen Brown at the Daily News is working on a story for next Tuesday about Epstein, Maxwell, and pitches made by victims' lawyers to in 2016 that "went nowhere." His email below explains further. His actual questions are at the end of his email. He has no expectations about guidance, but would appreciate any. Don't know if w